UNIVERSITY OF
HOUSTON-CLEAR LAKE
PHYS 6838: RESEARCH PROJECT AND SEMINAR
Spring, 2018
Meetings: M 7:00-9:50 PM, SSB 1100
Instructor: David Garrison, Ph.D.
Office: 3531 Bayou Bldg.
Phone: 281 283-3796
E-mail: garrison@uhcl.edu
Office Hours: TR 2:00-4:00 pm and by appointment
UHCL Emergency Hotline: 281 283-2221 (call this number to see if the university is closed for bad weather)
Prerequisites: You must be in your last 12 hours toward a Masters degree or this must be your last spring semester before finishing your degree.
Textbook: How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper by Robert A. Day and Barbara Gastel
Objectives: 1) Familiarize students with the general methods of attacking research problems. 2) Acquaint students with research taking place in physics and space science. 3) Give the students the opportunity to prepare and to present a research project orally and in writing.
Course format: 12 seminars by outside speakers and student presentations.
Method of evaluation: Before each talk, students should investigate the topic and come to class prepared to ask at least 3 questions. Students will prepare a research paper (in the form of a journal article) or a research (thesis) proposal on an acceptable topic in physics or space science and they will give an oral presentation on the same topic. Acceptable topics are very broad, but you should check with the instructor in case of doubt. The written paper will be weighted as 2/3 of the final grade; the oral presentation, 1/3. You must follow the guidelines for research papers that I will hand out. Criteria for evaluation are stated in the guidelines.
Attendance Policy: Students will maximize their learning experience by regularly attending class. You will be asked to sign an attendance roster at each class period. You get out of a course what you put into it.
Academic Honesty: All students should be aware of the university’s policy on academic honesty: I will be honest in all my academic activities and will not tolerate dishonesty.
Compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA): If you are certified as disabled and entitled to accommodation under the ADA, section 503, please notify the instructor as soon as possible. If you are not currently certified and believe you may qualify, please contact the UHCL Health and Disability Services office at 281 283-2627.
Learning
Outcomes: Upon completion of this course,
students will be able to 1) Understand how advanced scientific research is
performed and 2) Communicate details of advanced physics and space-science
research to a general audience both orally and in writing.
Spring 2018 UHCL Physics and Space Science Seminar Series Monday's 7-9pm |
|||
Date |
Speaker Name |
Speaker's Job Title |
Title or Topic of Presentation |
29-Jan |
Jancy McPhee |
Executive Director, SciArt Exchange |
Science…So What? |
5-Feb |
Peter Brown |
Research Scientist
at Texas A&M University/Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics &
Astronomy |
Measuring the
Universe with Exploding Stars |
12-Feb |
Wes Kelly |
Consultant Engineer, Triton Systems, LLC |
A Partially Re-Usable Horizontal Take-off and Landing Launch Vehicle - A Continuing Case Study |
19-Feb |
Allan Treiman |
Assoc. Director, LPI |
Venus' Radar-Reflective Highlands: Ferroelectric and Semiconductor Materials |
26-Feb |
Jonathan Kay |
Post-Doctoral Researcher, LPI |
Folding on Iapetus |
5-Mar |
Heath Skinner |
Assistant Professor
of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center |
Biologic modifiers
of radioresponse |
19-Mar |
Steve Fitzgerald |
Multi-physics Modeling and Simulation Lead |
Multiphysics
Modeling of Hyrdocarbon Leaks on the Gulf of Mexico
Floor |
26-Mar |
Shaun Stewart |
Senior Development
Engineer, Intuitive Machines |
Fusing Physics and
Video Game Technology to Build a Commercial Drilling Training Simulator |
2-Apr |
Tim Crain |
Vice President of Research and Development, Intuitive Machines |
Design of an
Automated Re-entry Vehicle for Priority Sample Returns |
9-Apr |
Georgiana Kramer |
Staff Scientist, LPI |
The Weather on the Moon and the |
16-Apr |
Steven Koontz |
ISS System Manager for Space Environments |
Spacecraft Charging: Hazard Causes, Hazard Effects, Hazard Controls |
23-Apr |
Craig Walton |
LaMont Aerospace/President |
ISS Utilization and the Commercialization of Space as a Resource |
30-Apr |
Student Presentations |
SCE Oral Communication Rubric
Presenter Name__________________________ Reviewer_________________________ Total Score ______
Evaluation |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
Bad
Habits |
Student
exhibits two or fewer presentation bad habits such as pacing, stammering,
hands in pockets, not engaging audience etc. |
Student
exhibits three or fewer presentation bad habits such as pacing, stammering,
hands in pockets, not engaging audience etc. |
Student
exhibits four or fewer presentation bad habits such as pacing, stammering,
hands in pockets, not engaging audience etc. |
Student
exhibits many presentation bad habits such as pacing, stammering, hands in
pockets, not engaging audience etc. |
|
Mechanics |
Presentation
has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Student's
presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
|
Eye
Contact |
Student
maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. |
Student
maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student
occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. |
Student
reads all of report with no eye contact. |
|
Elocution |
Student
uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all
audience members can hear presentation. |
Student's
voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience
members can hear presentation. |
Student's
voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have
difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student
mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for audience in
the back to hear. |
|
Personal
Appearance |
Dressed
and groomed appropriately. |
|
|
Not
dressed and groomed appropriately for such a presentation. |
|
Technical
Content |
Content
is technically sound, exhibits appropriate research, and depth is
appropriate. |
Content
is technically sound but could exhibit more research and depth. |
Content
is not strong, research and depth are lacking. |
Content
is trivial, research and depth are not demonstrated. |
|
Organization
and logical flow |
Student
presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can
follow. |
Student
presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. |
Audience
has difficulty following presentation because of poor logical flow of
information. |
Audience
cannot follow presentation because there is no logical flow of information. |
|
Response
to Audience Questions |
Student
demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class
questions with explanations and elaboration. |
Student
is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. |
Student
is uncomfortable with information and able to answer only rudimentary questions. |
Student
does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about
subject. |
|
Meaningful
Graphics and Visuals |
Student’s
graphics and visuals explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. |
Student’s
graphics and visuals relate to text and presentation. |
Student
occasionally uses graphics and visuals that rarely support text and
presentation. |
Student
uses no graphics. |
|
Time
Management |
Student
completely covers topic within the allocated time leaving an appropriate
amount of time for questions |
Student
adequately covers topic within the allocated time leaving an appropriate
amount of time for questions |
Student
covers topic with slight content omissions, or exceeds or underutilizes time
limits. |
Student inadequately covers topic and exceeds or
underutilizes time limits. |
|
Presentation
is appropriate for audiences in attendance and for objectives |
Presentation
communicates the presenters’ objectives, and uses language and
words/jargon/acronyms appropriate to the audience |
Presentation
communicates the presenter's objective, but does not use language and
words/jargon/acronyms appropriate to the audience |
Presentation
does not communicate the presenter's objective, but uses language and
words/jargon/acronyms appropriate to the audience |
Presentation
does not communicate the presenters’ objectives, nor uses language or
words/jargon/acronyms appropriate to the audience |
|